مدیریت اکوسیستم‌های طبیعی

مدیریت اکوسیستم‌های طبیعی

عوامل سازمانی و ارتباط انتشار دی اکسید کربن در بخش کشاورزی: یک تحلیل مقایسه‌ای بر اساس سطح درآمد

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استادیار، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران.
2 دانشجوی دکترای اقتصاد کشاورزی، گروه اقتصاد کشاورزی، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه زابل، زابل، ایران.
چکیده
فرآیند توسعه اقتصادی و مجموعه سیاست‌های اجراشده در دهه‌های اخیر موجب شده تا چالش‌های زیست‌محیطی به یکی از دغدغه‌های اصلی سیاست‌گذاران تبدیل شود. این مطالعه با هدف بررسی رابطه بین عوامل سازمانی و انتشار دی‌اکسیدکربن در گروهی از کشورها طی دوره زمانی ۲۰۰۹ تا ۲۰۲۴ و با به‌کارگیری رویکرد داده‌های تابلویی (پانل دیتا) انجام شده است. یافته‌ها حاکی از آن است که تولید ناخالص بخش کشاورزی، سیاست‌های حمایتی دولت و حجم تجارت در این بخش، تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر انتشاردی اکسیدکربن داشته‌اند. همچنین، اثر ترکیبی «ثبات سیاسی و کنترل فساد» به‌صورت مثبت و معنادار بر میزان انتشار دی‌اکسیدکربن مؤثر بوده است؛ در حالی که ترکیب «کنترل فساد و حاکمیت قانون» تأثیر منفی و معناداری بر آن نشان داده است. بر این اساس، به‌عنوان یک راهبرد کلان، پیشنهاد می‌شود کشورها با سرمایه‌گذاری هدفمند در زیرساخت‌های نهادی از جمله فناوری، قوانین و نهادهای حاکمیتی تلاش نظام‌مندی برای ارتقای این مؤلفه‌ها انجام دهند. علاوه‌بر این، توصیه می‌شود دولت‌ها در کنار افزایش مخارج خود، با اعمال مالیات‌های سبز یا مالیات بر انتشار کربن با نرخی کمتر از رشد مخارج ضمن کنترل آلایندگی، تداوم رشد اقتصادی را نیز تضمین نمایند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Institutional Factors and CO2 Emissions in the Agricultural Sector: A Comparative Analysis by Income Level

نویسندگان English

Alireza Sargazi 1
Narges Tavakoli Dastjerdi 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran.
2 PhD student in Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
چکیده English

The process of economic development and the implementation of various policiesin recent decades have made environmental challenges one of the main concerns of policymakers. Accordingly, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between institutional factors and CO₂ emissions across a group of countriesduring the period 2009-2024 using a panel data approach. thatThe findings indicate thatagricultural GDP, government support policies, and the volume of agricultural tradehave exerted a positive and significant effect on CO₂ emissions. Furthermore, the combined effectof " olitical stability and control of corruption" has had a positive and significant impact on CO₂ emissions, whereas the combined effect of " control of corruption and rule of law" exhibited a negative and significant impact on CO₂ emissions. Accordingly, as a strategic policy, it is recommended that countries make deliberate efforts to strengthen these componentshrough targeted investmentsin governance infrastructure, including technology, regulations, and institutions. Additionally, it is recommendedthat governments, n parallel with increasing public expenditures, implement green taxes or carbon emission taxes at a rate lower than the growth of expenditures in order to control emissions while ensuring sustained economic growth.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Environment
Corruption
Income
Agricultural Sector
Adewuyi, A. O., and Adeleke, A. M. (2016). Role of institutions and resource abundance in inclusiveness of Nigeria’s economic growth. The Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies58(1), 21-52.
Arellano, M., and Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The review of economic studies58(2), 277-297.
Arminen, H., and Menegaki, A. N. (2019). Corruption, climate and the energy-environment-growth nexus. Energy economics80, 621-634.
Baum, C. F., Schaffer, M. E., and Stillman, S. (2003). Instrumental variables and GMM: Estimation and testing. The Stata Journal3(1), 1-31.
Chen, H., Hao, Y., Li, J., and Song, X. (2018). The impact of environmental regulation, shadow economy, and corruption on environmental quality: Theory and empirical evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner production195, 200-214.
Cole, M. A. (2007). Corruption, income and the environment: an empirical analysis. Ecological economics, 62(3-4), 637-647.
Costello, A., Abbas, M., Allen, A., Ball, S., Bell, S., Bellamy, R., Friel, S., Groce, N., Johnson, A., Kett, M., Lee, M., Levy, C., Maslin, M., McCoy, D., McGuire, B., Montgomery, H., Napier, D., Pagel, C., Patel, J., Puppim de Oliveira, J. A., Redclift, N., Rees, H., Rogger, D., Scott, J., Stephenson, J., Twigg, J., Wolff, J., & Patterson, C. (2009). Lancet and University College London Institute for Global Health Commission. Managing the health effects of climate change. Lancet, The (UK edition)373(9676), 1693-1733.
Farhadi, M., Islam, M. R., and Moslehi, S. (2015). Economic freedom and productivity growth in resource-rich economies. World Development72, 109-126.
Galinato, G. I., and Galinato, S. P. (2012). The effects of corruption control, political stability and economic growth on deforestation-induced carbon dioxide emissions. Environment and development Economics17(1), 67-90.
Gao, Y., Gao, X., and Zhang, X. (2017). The 2 C global temperature target and the evolution of the long-term goal of addressing climate change—from the United Nations framework convention on climate change to the Paris agreement. Engineering3(2), 272-278.
Goel, R. K., Herrala, R., and Mazhar, U. (2013). Institutional quality and environmental pollution: MENA countries versus the rest of the world. Economic Systems37(4), 508-521.
Greenidge, K., McIntyre, M. M. A., and Yun, H. (2016). Structural reform and growth: What really matters? Evidence from the Caribbean. International Monetary Fund.
Grossman, G. M., and Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement.
Hosseini, H. M., and Kaneko, S. (2013). Can environmental quality spread through institutions? Energy Policy56, 312-321.
Jan, A., Marimuthu, M., Hassan, R., and Mehreen. (2019). Sustainable business practices and firm’s financial performance in islamic banking: Under the moderating role of islamic corporate governance. Sustainability11(23), 6606.
Joshi, P., and Beck, K. (2018). Democracy and carbon dioxide emissions: assessing the interactions of political and economic freedom and the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Research & Social Science39, 46-54.
Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.
Larraín B, F., and Tavares, J. (2004). Does foreign direct investment decrease corruption? Cuadernos de economía41(123), 199-215.
Lau, L. S., Choong, C. K., & Eng, Y. K. (2014). Carbon dioxide emission, institutional quality, and economic growth: empirical evidence in Malaysia. Renewable energy68, 276-281.
Levin, A., Lin, C. F., and Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of econometrics, 108(1), 1-24.
Maduka, A. C., Akunna, N., Ekesiobi, C. S., Okafor, S. N., and Chukwuemeka, D. E. (2021, July). Modelling environment-economic progress nexus for improved quality of life in Nigeria: a test of the Green Solow model. In 14th Conference of the Nigerian Association of Energy Economics, Themed: Strategic Responses of the Energy Sector to COVID-19 Impacts on African Economies.
Mesagan, E., and Ekundayo, P. (2015) Economic growth and carbon emission in Nigeria”. IUP Journal of Applied Economics 3(2):44–56
Mobosi, I. A., Madueme, S. I., and Osuntuyi, B. V. (2017). Impact of income growth on environmental quality in nigeria: an empirical test of the environmental kuznets hypothesis. Nigerian J Econ Soc Stud59(2), 121-152.
Ouedraogo, M., Peng, D., Chen, X., Hashmi, S. H., and Sall, M. I. (2021). Dynamic effect of oil resources on environmental quality: testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for selected African countries. Sustainability13(7), 3649.
Purcel, A. A. (2019). Does political stability hinder pollution? Evidence from developing states. Economic Research Guardian9(2), 75-98.
Rizk, R., and Slimane, M. B. (2018). Modelling the relationship between poverty, environment, and institutions: a panel data study. Environmental science and pollution research25(31), 31459-31473.
Saha, S., and Gounder, R. (2013). Corruption and economic development nexus: Variations across income levels in a non-linear framework. Economic Modelling31, 70-79.
Salman, M., Long, X., Dauda, L., and Mensah, C. N. (2019). The impact of institutional quality on economic growth and carbon emissions: Evidence from Indonesia, South Korea and Thailand. Journal of Cleaner Production241, 118331.
Sarkodie, S. A., and Adams, S. (2018). Renewable energy, nuclear energy, and environmental pollution: accounting for political institutional quality in South Africa. Science of the total environment643, 1590-1601.
Wang, N., Zhu, H., Guo, Y., and Peng, C. (2018). The heterogeneous effect of democracy, political globalization, and urbanization on PM2. 5 concentrations in G20 countries: Evidence from panel quantile regression. Journal of cleaner production194, 54-68.
Welsch, H. (2004). Corruption, growth, and the environment: a cross-country analysisUseful comment were received by Udo Ebert, Claudia Kemfert, Johann Graf Lambsdorff, Lutz Mommer, Hans-Michael Trautwein, and two anonymous referees.

  • تاریخ دریافت 21 خرداد 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 28 مهر 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 28 مهر 1404